Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2021; 12(12): 991-1000
Published online Dec 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.991
Published online Dec 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.991
Characteristics | mean ± SD |
Age (yr) | 59.27 ± 8.94 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 28.06 ± 4.58 |
Gender (Female), n (%) | 37 (42.05) |
Affected Side (Right), n (%) | 51 (57.95) |
Surgical treatment, n (%) | |
AA | 50 (56.8) |
MO | 38 (43.2) |
Follow up (mo) | 13.62 ± 5.08 |
VAS | 3.16 ± 2.7 |
CMS | 69.5 ± 14.41 |
DASH | 23.01 ± 21.07 |
SF-12, n (%) | |
Physical | 43.31 (9.53) |
Mental | 46.53 (11.88) |
- Citation: Solarino G, Bortone I, Vicenti G, Bizzoca D, Coviello M, Maccagnano G, Moretti B, D'Angelo F. Role of biomechanical assessment in rotator cuff tear repair: Arthroscopic vs mini-open approach. World J Orthop 2021; 12(12): 991-1000
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i12/991.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.991