Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Dec 18, 2021; 12(12): 983-990
Published online Dec 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.983
Published online Dec 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.983
ID | Description | Standardized technique | Computerized dimensions (mm) |
A1 | Basis length | Anterior to posterior | 15.2 |
A2 | Contour length | Anterior to posterior | 53.5 |
A3 | Height | Medial to lateral, most distal length | 22.9 |
B1 | Basis length | Anterior to posterior | 20.3 |
B2 | Contour length | Anterior to posterior | 31.9 |
B3 | Height | Medial to lateral, most distal length | 10.2 |
C1 | Medial contour length | Upper in Figure 2 | 31.9 |
C2 | Lateral contour length | Lower in Figure 2 | 31.6 |
C3 | Medial to lateral height | Short height in Figure 2 | 7.6 |
C4 | Anterior to posterior height | Long height in Figure 2 | 31.0 |
- Citation: Kitridis D, Alaseirlis D, Malliaropoulos N, Chalidis B, McMahon P, Debski R, Givissis P. Assessing the accuracy of arthroscopic and open measurements of the size of rotator cuff tears: A simulation-based study. World J Orthop 2021; 12(12): 983-990
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i12/983.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.983