Alignment of the hindfoot following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review

Table 2 Study characteristics and patient demographics

Ref.	LOE	Patients, n (%)	Knees, n (%)	Age (yr)	Sex (M/F)	Follow-up (mo)	MCMS
Chandler and Moskal[6], 2004	2	86	86	N/R	N/R	3	48
Cho et al[7], 2017	2	117	195	69.1	8/187	24	66
Hara et al[8], 2015	3	100	100	74.3	14/86	0.75	48
Jeong et al[9], 2018	2	331	375	68.3	23/308	6	60
Kim et al[10], 2018	3	55	65	69.3	N/R	31.3	71
Levinger et al[11], 2012	2	19	26	67.5	13/6	12	46
Mansur et al[12], 2019	2	72	72	N/R	23/49	3	44
Mullaji and Shetty[13], 2011	2	125	165	66.1	24/101	12	51
Okamoto et al[14], 2017	3	75	80	72.5	8/67	24	48
Palanisami et al[15], 2020	3	91	121	63.4	29/62	12	58
Takenaka et al[16], 2016	3	71	73	74.7	17/56	12	48

LOE: Level of evidence; M/F: Male/female; MCMS: Modified Coleman methodological score.