Short-term effectiveness of high- and low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: A pilot study

doi:10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.781

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 10

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (5903)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-2) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

508

WORD

128

HTML

3628

Figures (1-2)

263

Tables (1-4)

317

Sum=4844

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

349

Download

710

Sum=1059

Oct 18, 2021 (publication date) through Dec 23, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (8)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Orthopedics

ISSN

2218-5836

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Trials Study

World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2021; 12(10): 781-790
Published online Oct 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.781

Table 4 Pain induced during the interventions

Variable	HIPE (n = 5)	LIPE (n = 5)	DN (n = 5)	Mean difference (95%CI)	ANOVA interaction effect	*Bonferroni post-hoc* analysis**
VAS (0-10)	3.2 ± 0.8	3.2 ± 0.8	5.0 ± 1.1	0.0 (-1.4-1.4)¹1.80 ± (-3.2--0.4)²1.80 (-3.2--0.4)³	F = 8.52; P = 0.005; η² = 0.587	Group	P < 0.01⁴^,⁵

¹High-intensity percutaneous electrolysis (HIPE) vs low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis (LIPE).

²HIPE vs dry needling (DN).

³LIPE vs DN.

⁴Simple between-group effects between HIPE and DN.

⁵Simple between-group effects between LIPE and DN.

VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; HIPE: High-intensity percutaneous electrolysis; LIPE: Low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis; DN: Dry needling; ANOVA: One-way analysis of variance.

Citation: Valera-Calero JA, Sánchez-Mayoral-Martín A, Varol U. Short-term effectiveness of high- and low-intensity percutaneous electrolysis in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: A pilot study. World J Orthop 2021; 12(10): 781-790
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i10/781.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i10.781