Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2021; 12(1): 14-23
Published online Jan 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.14
Published online Jan 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.14
CoPE, n = 17 | CoC, n = 25 | |||||
Zones | I | II | III | I | II | III |
Radiolucent lines | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Osteolysis cup | 0 | 1 (6%) | 0 | 2 (8%) | 3 (12%) | 0 |
Atrophy | 2 (12%) | 3 (18%) | 0 | 5 (19%) | 5 (19%) | 0 |
Hypertrophy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
- Citation: van Loon J, Hoornenborg D, van der Vis HM, Sierevelt IN, Opdam KT, Kerkhoffs GM, Haverkamp D. Ceramic-on-ceramic vs ceramic-on-polyethylene, a comparative study with 10-year follow-up. World J Orthop 2021; 12(1): 14-23
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i1/14.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.14