Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2021; 12(1): 14-23
Published online Jan 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.14
Published online Jan 18, 2021. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.14
Table 1 Baseline characteristics and operation information
| CoPE, n = 27 (100%) | CoC, n = 34 (100%) | P value | |
| Female gender, n (%) | 21 (78%) | 22 (65%) | 0.27 |
| Right side, n (%) | 19 (76%) | 17 (50%) | 0.11 |
| Diagnosis, n (%) | 0.01 | ||
| Primary OA | 23 (85%) | 19 (56%) | |
| Other | 4 (15%) | 15 (44%) | |
| Age, in years, mean (SD) | 64.2 (5.3) | 55.7 (8.5) | < 0.001 |
| BMI, in kg/m2 mean (SD) | 27.6 (4.1) | 26.9 (4.1) | 0.52 |
| Cup size in mm, mean (SD) | 52.1 (3.4) | 53.6 (3.5) | 0.10 |
| Inclination cup in degrees, mean (SD) | 46.8 (6.7) | 44.6 (5.0) | 0.22 |
| HHS, mean (SD) | 50.2 (13.3) | 47.5 (13.4) | 0.44 |
- Citation: van Loon J, Hoornenborg D, van der Vis HM, Sierevelt IN, Opdam KT, Kerkhoffs GM, Haverkamp D. Ceramic-on-ceramic vs ceramic-on-polyethylene, a comparative study with 10-year follow-up. World J Orthop 2021; 12(1): 14-23
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v12/i1/14.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v12.i1.14