Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Apr 18, 2020; 11(4): 213-221
Published online Apr 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.213
Published online Apr 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.213
Table 1 Summary characteristics of study population
| Characteristic | Day case | Inpatients | P value |
| n | 18 | 41 | |
| Age [mean (SD)] | 70.9 (11.1) | 71.7 (8.53) | 0.758 |
| Male (%) | 4 (22.2) | 11 (26.8) | 0.960 |
| Right side (%) | 10 (55.6) | 27 (65.9) | 0.645 |
| Reverse (%) | 15 (83.3) | 34 (82.9) | 1.000 |
| Mean preoperative flexion [degrees (SD)] | 43.2 (25.9) | 57.9 (30.1) | 0.079 |
| Mean preoperative abduction [degrees (SD)] | 52.6 (27.7) | 53.9 (27.4) | 0.883 |
| Indications | |||
| Glenohumeral arthritis (%) | 8 (44.4) | 17 (41.4) | 1.000 |
| Rotator cuff tendonitis (%) | 9 (50.0) | 17 (41.4) | 0.580 |
| Rotator cuff tear (%) | 10 (55.6) | 13 (31.7) | 0.146 |
| Length of stay [median (IQR)] | N/A | 2 d 6 h (27.6-78.4 h) |
- Citation: Borakati A, Ali A, Nagaraj C, Gadikoppula S, Kurer M. Day case vs inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study and cost-effectiveness analysis. World J Orthop 2020; 11(4): 213-221
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i4/213.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i4.213