Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2020; 11(11): 483-491
Published online Nov 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483
Published online Nov 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483
Table 3 Radiographic results in the proximal femoral nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation groups
| PFN group | PFNA group | P value | |
| Reduction | 0.830 | ||
| Good, n (%) | 34 (46.6%) | 42 (49.4%), | |
| Normal, n (%) | 31 (42.5%) | 36 (42.4%) | |
| Poor | 8 | 7 | |
| Cleveland Index | 0.577 | ||
| Zone 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Zone 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| Zone 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Zone 4 | 2 | 2 | |
| Zone 5 | 34 | 42 | |
| Zone 6 | 11 | 15 | |
| Zone 7 | 3 | 4 | |
| Zone 8 | 14 | 19 | |
| Zone 9 | 8 | 3 | |
| Zone 5 + 6 + 8 + 9, n (%) | 67 (91.8%) | 79 (92.9%) | 0.218 |
| TAD, mm | 7.2 (2.1-12.3) | 7.9 (3.6-14.9) | 0.222 |
| Union rate, % (n) | 87.7 (64/73) | 94.1 (80/85) | 0.155 |
| Union time, wk | 14.9 (12-17) | 13.7 (11-18) | 0.156 |
| Sliding distance, mm | 6.1 (0-23.6) | 3.2 (0-18.4) | 0.036 |
- Citation: Baek SH, Baek S, Won H, Yoon JW, Jung CH, Kim SY. Does proximal femoral nail antirotation achieve better outcome than previous-generation proximal femoral nail? World J Orthop 2020; 11(11): 483-491
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i11/483.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483