Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Nov 18, 2020; 11(11): 483-491
Published online Nov 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483
Published online Nov 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483
Table 2 Clinical outcomes in the proximal femoral nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation groups
| PFN group | PFNA group | P value | |
| Operation time, min | 67.3 | 63.2 | 0.395 |
| Salvati and Wilson score score[16] | 0.328 | ||
| Excellent (32 or more) | 26 | 36 | |
| Good (24-31) | 35 | 44 | |
| Fair (16-23) | 8 | 4 | |
| Poor (15 or less) | 4 | 1 | |
| Excellent + good | 61 (83.6%) | 80 (94.1%) | 0.033 |
| Mortality within one year | 16 (21.9%) | 20 (23.5%) | 0.629 |
- Citation: Baek SH, Baek S, Won H, Yoon JW, Jung CH, Kim SY. Does proximal femoral nail antirotation achieve better outcome than previous-generation proximal femoral nail? World J Orthop 2020; 11(11): 483-491
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i11/483.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i11.483