Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2020; 11(10): 442-452
Published online Oct 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.442
Published online Oct 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.442
Table 4 Mean wear rates per year, presented as mean with ranges
| Conventional PE (Polyethylene) | P value | REXPOL | P value | |
| Medial (mm/yr) | -0.021 (-0.028 to -0.015) | < 0.001 | 0.004 (-0.002 to 0.009) | 0.21 |
| Proximal (mm/yr) | 0.033 (0.018 to 0.047) | < 0.001 | 0.003 (-0.011 to 0.017) | 0.66 |
| Volume (mm3/yr) | 15.94 (2.729 to 29.15) | 0.02 | -5.545 (-20.36 to 9.269) | 0.46 |
| Corrected volume (mm3/yr) | 18.53 (7.188 to 29.86) | 0.002 | -2.142 (-14.13 to 9.841) | 0.72 |
- Citation: van Loon J, Hoornenborg D, Sierevelt I, Opdam KT, Kerkhoffs GM, Haverkamp D. Highly cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene inserts in total hip arthroplasty, a five-year Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis randomised controlled trial. World J Orthop 2020; 11(10): 442-452
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i10/442.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.442