Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Oct 18, 2020; 11(10): 442-452
Published online Oct 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.442
Published online Oct 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.442
Table 3 Total wear in all directions at the five-year follow-up, presented as mean with ranges
| Conventional PE (Polyethylene) | REXPOL | P value | |
| Medial (mm) | -0.128 (-0.202 to -0.054) | 0.013 (-0.054 to 0.081) | 0.006 |
| Proximal (mm) | 0.196 (0.054 to 0.338) | 0.017 (-0.120 to 0.154) | 0.07 |
| Volume (mm3) | 113.39 (-2.48 to 229.26) | -30.59 (-167.16 to 105.98) | 0.10 |
| Corrected volume (mm3) | 121.6 (17.76 to 225.46) | -12.45 (-122.94; 98.03) | 0.07 |
- Citation: van Loon J, Hoornenborg D, Sierevelt I, Opdam KT, Kerkhoffs GM, Haverkamp D. Highly cross-linked versus conventional polyethylene inserts in total hip arthroplasty, a five-year Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis randomised controlled trial. World J Orthop 2020; 11(10): 442-452
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i10/442.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i10.442