Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2020; 11(1): 47-56
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.47
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.47
Table 3 Measure of intervention groups’ agility at baseline, acute and chronic phases
Baseline agility (s) | Acute agility (s) | Chronic agility (s) | Baseline/acute agility (P value) | Baseline/chronic agility (P value) | |
Static stretching group | 10.9 ± 0.3 | 10.4 ± 0.4 | 10.2 ± 0.4 | 0.0012c | 0.00013c |
Dynamic stretching group | 10.5 ± 0.4 | 9.9 ± 0.3 | 9.8 ± 0.5 | 0.0003c | 0.078 |
DTFM group | 9.9 ± 0.7 | 10.1 ± 0.5 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 0.00013c | 0.0231a |
- Citation: Fakhro MA, Chahine H, Srour H, Hijazi K. Effect of deep transverse friction massage vs stretching on football players’ performance. World J Orthop 2020; 11(1): 47-56
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i1/47.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.47