Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Orthop. Jan 18, 2020; 11(1): 47-56
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.47
Published online Jan 18, 2020. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.47
Table 1 Measure of intervention groups’ extensibility at baseline, acute and chronic phases
| Baseline extensibility (Degrees) | Acute extensibility (Degrees) | Chronic extensibility (Degrees) | Baseline/acute extensibility (P value) | Baseline/chronic extensibility (P value) | |
| Static stretching group | 88.7 ± 1.5 | 94.0 ± 2.2 | 100.0 ± 0.6 | 0.0002c | 0.0002c |
| Dynamic stretching group | 91.2 ± 1.1 | 91.2 ± 2.6 | 92.1 ± 0.9 | 0.937 | 0.188 |
| DTFM group | 92.8 ± 1.2 | 94.6 ± 2.1 | 95.7 ± 0.7 | 0.0011c | 0.0002c |
- Citation: Fakhro MA, Chahine H, Srour H, Hijazi K. Effect of deep transverse friction massage vs stretching on football players’ performance. World J Orthop 2020; 11(1): 47-56
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v11/i1/47.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.47