Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Orthop. Sep 18, 2019; 10(9): 310-326
Published online Sep 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.310
Published online Sep 18, 2019. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.310
Follow-up | ||||||||||||
Variable-s | 0 | Wk 4 | Wk 8 | Wk 12 | 0 | Wk 4 | Wk 8 | Wk 12 | 0 | Wk 4 | Wk 8 | Wk 12 |
Group PRP-1 (Single injection; n = 28 patients) | Group PRP-2 (Double injection; n = 28 patients) | Group hyaluronic acid (n = 27 patients) | ||||||||||
WOMAC subscales | ||||||||||||
Pain | ||||||||||||
Mean | 12.03 | 6.11 | 6.46 | 7.32 | 12.11 | 5 | 5.29 | 6.25 | 12.07 | 9.41 | 9.67 | 10.63 |
P value | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | |||||||||
% change1 (vs baseline) | -49.09 | -45.81 | -39.09 | -59.47 | -56.95 | -48.61 | -22.01 | -19.80 | -11.34 | |||
P value | At each follow-up, the percentage change from baseline was greater in group PRP-2 than in group PRP-1, and greater in group PRP-1 than in group hyaluronic acid (P < 0.001). | |||||||||||
Stiffness | ||||||||||||
Mean | 4.39 | 2.14 | 2.25 | 2.79 | 5.04 | 1.75 | 1.89 | 2.57 | 4.85 | 3.11 | 3.07 | 3.93 |
P value | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | |||||||||
% change1 (vs baseline) | -50.64 | -47.36 | -32.87 | -67.96 | -65.12 | -47.65 | -32.50 | -33.16 | -14.42 | |||
P value | At each follow-up, the percentage change from baseline was greater in group PRP-2 than in group PRP-1, and greater in group PRP-1 than in group hyaluronic acid (P < 0.001). | |||||||||||
Physical function | ||||||||||||
Mean | 46.93 | 28.14 | 28.04 | 31.89 | 44.39 | 22 | 23.39 | 26.54 | 46.19 | 37.85 | 39.41 | 42.52 |
P value | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | |||||||||
% change1 (vs baseline) | -39.28 | -39.30 | -30.97 | -49.46 | -46.31 | -38.91 | -18.31 | -14.53 | -7.69 | |||
P value | At each follow-up, the percentage change from baseline was greater in group PRP-2 than in group PRP-1, and greater in group PRP-1 than in group hyaluronic acid (P < 0.001). | |||||||||||
Total | ||||||||||||
Mean | 63.71 | 36.46 | 37.14 | 42.5 | 61.57 | 28.75 | 30.61 | 35.32 | 63.11 | 50.44 | 52.67 | 57.26 |
P value | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | |||||||||
% change1 (vs baseline) | -42.34 | -41.13 | -32.66 | -52.77 | -49.79 | -41.75 | -20.35 | -16.61 | -9.12 | |||
P value | At each follow-up, the percentage change from baseline was greater in group PRP-2 than in group PRP-1, and greater in group PRP-1 than in group hyaluronic acid (P < 0.001). | |||||||||||
VAS | ||||||||||||
Mean | 8.25 | 4.32 | 4.61 | 5.39 | 8.29 | 2.89 | 3.79 | 4.46 | 8.15 | 5.96 | 6.37 | 7.04 |
P value | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | Mean scores decreased significantly (P < 0.05) | |||||||||
% change1 (vs baseline) | -47.6 | -44.25 | -34.44 | -65.28 | -54.31 | -46.25 | -26.69 | -21.99 | -13.71 | |||
P value | At each follow-up, the percentage change from baseline was greater in group PRP-2 than in group PRP-1, and greater in group PRP-1 than in group hyaluronic acid (P < 0.001). |
- Citation: Tavassoli M, Janmohammadi N, Hosseini A, Khafri S, Esmaeilnejad-Ganji SM. Single- and double-dose of platelet-rich plasma versus hyaluronic acid for treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial. World J Orthop 2019; 10(9): 310-326
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v10/i9/310.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i9.310