Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 10, 2018; 9(2): 26-32
Published online Apr 10, 2018. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v9.i2.26
Published online Apr 10, 2018. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v9.i2.26
Targets, length of the amplicons and primers’ sequences | Patients with primary BC | Results | Ref. |
ALU, 115 bp | Healthy females (n = 51) and BC patients (n = 83) DNA from serum | The ratio ALU247/115 was higher in 51 patients with stage II (P = 0.005), stage III (P < 0.0001), stage IV (0.002) compared to healthy controls but not in 32 patients with stage 0 or I | Umetani et al[22], 2006 |
FW: 5’-CCTGAGGTCAGGAGTTCGAG-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CCCGAGTAGCTGGGATTACA-3’ | |||
ALU, 247 bp | |||
FW: 5’-GTGGCTCACGCCTGTAATC-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CAGGCTGGAGTGCAGTGG-3’ | |||
ALU, 115 bp | Healthy females (n = 49) and BC patients (n = 39) DNA from plasma | In the group of patients the ratio ALU247/115 was twice higher (P < 0.0001) than in the group of healthy controls | Agostini et al[23], 2012 |
FW: 5’-CCTGAGGTCAGGAGTTCGAG-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CCCGAGTAGCTGGGATTACA-3’ | |||
ALU, 247 bp | |||
FW: 5’-GTGGCTCACGCCTGTAATC-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CAGGCTGGAGTGCAGTGG-3’ | |||
ALU, 115 bp | Healthy females (n = 28), benign breast disease patients (n = 12), locally confined BC patients (n = 65) and MBC patients (n = 47) DNA from plasma | The ratio ALU247/115 was higher in patients with locally confined BC and metastatic BC than in benign BC (P < 0.001), but not vs healthy controls | Stötzer et al[24], 2014 |
FW: 5’-CCTGAGGTCAGGAGTTCGAG-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CCCGAGTAGCTGGGATTACA-3’ | |||
ALU, 247 bp | |||
FW: 5’-GTGGCTCACGCCTGTAATC-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CAGGCTGGAGTGCAGTGG-3’ | |||
ALU, 111 bp | Healthy females (n = 100), primary BC patients (n = 82) and MBC patients (n = 201) DNA from plasma | Both the ratios ALU 260/111 and LINE-1 266/97 were lower in primary BC patients (ALU: P = 0.046; LINE-1 P = 0.041) In MBC patients the lower values of cfDI were related to both a decrease in PFS (P = 0.0025 for ALU) and OS (P < 0.0001 for both ALU and LINE-1 fragments) | Madhavan et al[21], 2014 |
FW: 5’-CTGGCCAACATGGTGAAAC-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-AGCGATTCTCCTGCCTCAG-3’ | |||
ALU, 260 bp | |||
FW: 5’-ACGCCTGTAATCCCAGCA-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CGGAGTCTCGCTCTGTCG-3’ | |||
LINE-1, 97 bp | |||
FW: 5’-TGGCACATATACACCATGGAA-3’ | |||
RV: 5’TGAGAATGATGGTTTCCAATTTC-3’ | |||
LINE-1, 266 bp | |||
FW: 5’-ACTTGGAACCAACCCAAATG-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CACCACAGTCCCCAGAGTG-3’ | |||
ALU, 115 bp | Healthy females (n = 51) and BC patients (n = 148) DNA from serum | The ratio ALU 247/115 was significantly higher in patients compared to controls (P < 0.001) | Iqbal et al[25], 2015 |
FW: 5’-CCTGAGGTCAGGAGTTCGAG-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CCCGAGTAGCTGGGATTACA-3’ | |||
ALU, 247 bp | |||
FW: 5’-GTGGCTCACGCCTGTAATC-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CAGGCTGGAGTGCAGTGG-3’ | |||
Beta-actin, 100 bp | Healthy females (n = 70), benign lesions (n = 95) and BC patients (n = 95) DNA from plasma | cfDI value calculated as difference between 400 bp and 100 bp fragments Higher cfDI values were obtained in BC compared to benign lesions and healthy subjects (P < 0.001) | Kamel et al[20], 2016 |
FW: 5’-GCACCACACCTTCTACAATGA-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-GTCATCTTCTCGCGGTTGGC-3’ | |||
Beta-actin, 400 bp | |||
FW: 5-GCACCACACCTTCTACAATGA-3’ | |||
(common primer) | |||
RV: 5’-TGTCACGCACGATTTCCC-3’ | |||
HER2, 126 bp | Healthy females (n = 10), BC patients (n = 79) DNA from serum | The ratios BCAS1 266/129, MYC 264/128, PIK3CA 274/129 were significantly higher in patients compared to controls (P = 0.002, P = 0.030 and P = 0.004, respectively) No significant values for HER2 targets | Maltoni et al[28], 2017 |
FW-5-CCAGGGTGTTCCTCAGTTGT-3’ | |||
RV-5- -GGAGTTCCTGCAGAGGACAG-3’ | |||
HER2, 295 bp | |||
FW-5’-CCAGGGTGTTCCTCAGTTGT-3’ | |||
RV-5’-TCAGTATGGCCTCACCCTTC-3’ | |||
MYC, 128 bp | |||
FW-5-GGCATTTAAATTTCGGCTCA-3’ | |||
RV-5-AAAAGCCAAATGCCAACTT-3’ | |||
MYC, 264 bp | |||
FW-5’-TGGAGTAGGGACCGCATATC-3’ | |||
RV-5’-ACCCAACACCACGTCCTAAC-3’ | |||
BCAS1, 129 bp | |||
FW-5-GGGTCAGAGCTTCCTGTGAG-3’ | |||
RV-5-TATCATGCCTTGGAGAACCA-3’ | |||
BCAS1, 266 bp | |||
FW-5’-GGGTCAGAGCTTCCTGTGAG-3’ | |||
RV-5’-CGTTGTCCTGAAACAGAGCA-3’ | |||
PIK3CA, 129 bp | |||
FW-5’CTCCACGACCATCATCATCAGGT-3’ | |||
RV-5’-TGGTTATTAATGAGCCTCACGG-3’ | |||
PIK3CA, 274 bp | |||
FW-5’-CTC CACGAC CAT CATCAGGT-3’ | |||
RV-5’-CGAAGGTCACAAAGTCGTCT-3’ | |||
ALU, 111 bp | Non-recurrent BC patients (n = 175) vs recurrent-BC patients (n = 37) No healthy females reported DNA from plasma | Both the ratios ALU260/111 and LINE1-266/97 were significantly lower during follow-up in recurrent BC vs non recurrent BC (P < 0.001 for both ALU and LINE-1 cfDI), Moreover, BC patients with a lower cfDI had higher risk of developing recurrence compared to patients with higher cfDI (P = 0.020 for ALU cfDI and P = 0.019 for LINE-1 cfDI, respectively) | Cheng et al[26], 2017 |
FW: 5’-CTGGCCAACATGGTGAAAC-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-AGCGATTCTCCTGCCTCAG-3’ | |||
ALU, 260 bp | |||
FW: 5’-ACGCCTGTAATCCCAGCA-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CGGAGTCTCGCTCTGTCG-3’ | |||
LINE-1, 97 bp | |||
FW: 5’-TGGCACATATACACCATGGAA-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-TGAGAATGATGGTTTCCAATTTC-3’ | |||
LINE-1, 266 bp | |||
FW: 5’-ACTTGGAACCAACCCAAATG-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CACCACAGTCCCCAGAGTG-3’ | |||
ALU, 111 bp | MBC patients (total n = 268) No healthy females DNA from plasma | Both the ratios ALU260/111 and LINE1-266/97 significantly increased in 268 MBC patients treated with one cycle of chemotherapy (MBCLB) compared to MBC at baseline (MBC1C) (P = 0.00017 for ALU -0.053 vs 0.063- and P = 0.0016 for LINE-1-0.45 vs 0.49) Moreover, in both MBCBL and MBC1C patients with a higher cfDI (for both ALU and LINE-1) correlated with a higher PFS and OS vs lower cfDI MBC patients | Cheng et al[27], 2018 |
FW: 5’-CTGGCCAACATGGTGAAAC-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-AGCGATTCTCCTGCCTCAG-3’ | |||
ALU, 260 bp | |||
FW: 5’-ACGCCTGTAATCCCAGCA-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CGGAGTCTCGCTCTGTCG-3’ | |||
LINE-1, 97 bp | |||
FW: 5’-TGGCACATATACACCATGGAA-3’ | |||
RV: 5’TGAGAATGATGGTTTCCAATTTC-3’ | |||
LINE-1, 266 bp | |||
FW: 5’-ACTTGGAACCAACCCAAATG-3’ | |||
RV: 5’-CACCACAGTCCCCAGAGTG-3’ |
- Citation: Sobhani N, Generali D, Zanconati F, Bortul M, Scaggiante B. Cell-free DNA integrity for the monitoring of breast cancer: Future perspectives? World J Clin Oncol 2018; 9(2): 26-32
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v9/i2/26.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v9.i2.26