Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2017; 8(4): 336-342
Published online Aug 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i4.336
Table 3 Prioritization of distribution criteria
MeanCriteriaEthical Framework
Strongly disagree0.0
37.1Order of arrival should impact the priority given to a patientFirst-come first-served
41.8A patient with fewer co-morbidities should be given priority over a patient who has more co-morbiditiesSickest first
44.3Younger patients should receive priority over older patientsFair innings
47.3A patient with longer anticipated survival should be given priority over a patient with shorter anticipated survivalSaving the most
51.8A patient needing a small dose of a shortage drug should be prioritized over a patient needing a larger doseSaving the most
57.2A patient using a drug for an approved indication should have priority over a patient using the drug for off-label useSaving the most
61.0A patient who is starting therapy should be prioritized over a patient who has nearly completed therapySaving the most
74.3A patient using the shortage drug for curative intent should be prioritized over a patient using the drug for palliationSaving the most
Strongly agree100.0