Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2017; 8(4): 320-328
Published online Aug 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i4.320
Table 3 Correlation between atezolizumab activity and outcome and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 immunohistochemestry score
Author/studyMarker antibodyTumor typeTreatment linePD-L1 cutoffN ptsResponse (%)mPFS mo (95%CI)mOS mo (95%CI)
AtezolizumabNRNR
NRNR
NRNR
NRNR
Herbst et al[19] Phase IVentana SP142NSCLC≥ 2Score 36837.8 (2.7-12.3)15.5 (9.8-NA)
Score 27143.4 (1.4-6.9)15.1 (8.4-NA)
Score 113153.0 (2.8-4.1)15.5 (11.1-NA)
Score 020204.1 (2.7-5.6)9.7 (6.7-12.0)
Fehrenbacher et al[20] POPLAR Phase IIVentana SP142NSCLC≥ 2Score 32437.504.2 (2.9-7.0)20.5 (17.5-NA)
Score 25022.004.1 (2.8-5.3)16.3 (13.3-20.1)
Score 19318.304.1 (2.9-4.3)15.7 (12.6-18.0)
Score 05114.604.0 (3.1-4.2)12.6 (9.6-15.2)
Rittmeyer et al[21] OAK Phase IIIVentanaNSCLC≥ 2Score 37230.607.3 (4.9-12.0)26.9 (12.0-NA)
SP142Score 212922.507.3 (5.7-9.7)23.5 (18.1-NA)
Score 124117.80
Score 0807.807.6 (4.0-9.7)23.5 (18.1-NA)
Wakelee et al[22] and Antonia et al[23] BIRCH Phase IIVentanaNSCLC1Score 36534
SP142TC2/3 or IC2/313825
Score 27318