Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2017; 8(4): 320-328
Published online Aug 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i4.320
Published online Aug 10, 2017. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i4.320
Table 3 Correlation between atezolizumab activity and outcome and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 immunohistochemestry score
Author/study | Marker antibody | Tumor type | Treatment line | PD-L1 cutoff | N pts | Response (%) | mPFS mo (95%CI) | mOS mo (95%CI) |
Atezolizumab | NR | NR | ||||||
NR | NR | |||||||
NR | NR | |||||||
NR | NR | |||||||
Herbst et al[19] Phase I | Ventana SP142 | NSCLC | ≥ 2 | Score 3 | 6 | 83 | 7.8 (2.7-12.3) | 15.5 (9.8-NA) |
Score 2 | 7 | 14 | 3.4 (1.4-6.9) | 15.1 (8.4-NA) | ||||
Score 1 | 13 | 15 | 3.0 (2.8-4.1) | 15.5 (11.1-NA) | ||||
Score 0 | 20 | 20 | 4.1 (2.7-5.6) | 9.7 (6.7-12.0) | ||||
Fehrenbacher et al[20] POPLAR Phase II | Ventana SP142 | NSCLC | ≥ 2 | Score 3 | 24 | 37.50 | 4.2 (2.9-7.0) | 20.5 (17.5-NA) |
Score 2 | 50 | 22.00 | 4.1 (2.8-5.3) | 16.3 (13.3-20.1) | ||||
Score 1 | 93 | 18.30 | 4.1 (2.9-4.3) | 15.7 (12.6-18.0) | ||||
Score 0 | 51 | 14.60 | 4.0 (3.1-4.2) | 12.6 (9.6-15.2) | ||||
Rittmeyer et al[21] OAK Phase III | Ventana | NSCLC | ≥ 2 | Score 3 | 72 | 30.60 | 7.3 (4.9-12.0) | 26.9 (12.0-NA) |
SP142 | Score 2 | 129 | 22.50 | 7.3 (5.7-9.7) | 23.5 (18.1-NA) | |||
Score 1 | 241 | 17.80 | ||||||
Score 0 | 80 | 7.80 | 7.6 (4.0-9.7) | 23.5 (18.1-NA) | ||||
Wakelee et al[22] and Antonia et al[23] BIRCH Phase II | Ventana | NSCLC | 1 | Score 3 | 65 | 34 | ||
SP142 | TC2/3 or IC2/3 | 138 | 25 | |||||
Score 2 | 73 | 18 |
- Citation: Tibaldi C, Lunghi A, Baldini E. Use of programmed cell death protein ligand 1 assay to predict the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8(4): 320-328
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v8/i4/320.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v8.i4.320