Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 10, 2015; 6(5): 142-146
Published online Oct 10, 2015. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i5.142
Published online Oct 10, 2015. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i5.142
Ref. | No. of CRLM patients undergoing PVE | Percentage change in tumor volume and/or TGR and/or percentage of patients developing tumor progression after PVE |
Simoneau et al[13] | n = 109 | 33.4% increase in TV in the right lobe (P < 0.001) and 49.9% increase in TV in the left lobe (P = 0.022) post-PVE |
Elias et al[14] | n = 48 | 60% to 970% increase in TV post-PVE |
Kokudo et al[15] | n = 18 | +20.8% (P = 0.016) increase in TV and 18.5% (P = 0.014) increase in percent tumor volume post-PVE |
Mueller et al[19] | n = 53 | 80.9% (n = 17/53) of patients were unresectable due to tumor progression post-PVE |
Pamecha et al[21] | n = 36 | 33% (n = 12/36) of patients had tumor progression post-PVE |
Hoekstra et al[22] | n = 28 | 25% (n = 7/28) of patients developed new lesions in FLR and 42% of patients (n = 8/19) had tumor recurrence in the liver on follow up post-PVE |
Pamecha et al[23] | n = 22 | TGR post-PVE was 0.36 ± 0.68 mL/d (-1) (P = 0.06) |
Lindner et al[24] | n = 19 | 21% of patients developed tumor progression post-PVE |
- Citation: Al-Sharif E, Simoneau E, Hassanain M. Portal vein embolization effect on colorectal cancer liver metastasis progression: Lessons learned. World J Clin Oncol 2015; 6(5): 142-146
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v6/i5/142.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v6.i5.142