Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2015; 6(4): 73-79
Published online Aug 10, 2015. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i4.73
Published online Aug 10, 2015. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v6.i4.73
Figure 4 Histogram of rankings generated by the Bayesian network meta-analysis.
The graphs reflect a total of 20000 iterations and consist of as many histograms as the treatments (N = 6 plus best supportive care) included in the analysis. In each panel, the histogram shows the percent distribution of the simulations across ranks 1 (most effective treatment) through 7 (least effective treatment); the y-axis shows probability on a 0 to 1 scale. BSC: Best supportive care.
- Citation: Badiani B, Maratea D, Messori A. Second-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: Interpreting outcomes by network meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2015; 6(4): 73-79
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v6/i4/73.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v6.i4.73