Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2014; 5(5): 921-930
Published online Dec 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i5.921
Published online Dec 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i5.921
Table 2 Dosimetric correlates for rectal toxicity in image-based brachytherapy
| D2cc (mean) | D1cc (mean) | D0.1cc (mean) | |
| Koom et al[24] VRS ≥ 2 | 75 Gy vs 69 Gy (P = 0.02) | 80 Gy vs 73 Gy (P = 0.02) | 90 Gy vs 85 Gy (P = 0.04) |
| Georg et al[25] VRS ≥ 3 | 72 Gy vs 62 Gy (P < 0.001) | 76 Gy vs 65 Gy (P < 0.001) | 88 Gy vs 75 Gy (P = 0.002) |
| Georg et al[26] Symptomatic | 72 Gy vs 64 Gy (P < 0.01) | 76 Gy vs 67 Gy (P < 0.01) | 88 Gy vs 77 Gy (P = 0.03) |
- Citation: Vargo JA, Beriwal S. Image-based brachytherapy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5(5): 921-930
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v5/i5/921.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v5.i5.921