Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Dec 10, 2014; 5(5): 845-857
Published online Dec 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i5.845
Table 4 Grey shading indicates dose-fractionation schedules which would be supported by current evidence
CaseN treating with EBRT8Gy/120Gy/530Gy/10OtherMedian (Range)
Uncomplicated-non-spine
Nakamura case 1 (Japan, 2012)5113.70%9.80%66.70%9.80%NR (NR)
Uncomplicated-spine
Hartsell case 2 (United States, 1998)2294% recommended < 30Gy76% recommended 30-35Gy 20% recommended > 35GyNR (15Gy/5 – 47.5Gy/25)
Nakamura case 2 (Japan 2012)515.90%3.90%78.40%11.80%NR (NR)
Chow case 3 (Canada, 2000)17115.80%66.10%8.80%9.4%3NR (8Gy/1 – 30Gy/10)
Chow case 2 (Canada, 2000)17015.90%64.70%8.20%11.2%3NR (8Gy/1 – 30Gy/10)
Fairchild case 3 (Intl, 2009)86718.3%219.8%241.9%220.00%30Gy/10 (3Gy/1 - 55Gy/22)
De Bari case 2 (Italy, 2011)107€22.20%50.10%26.80%0.90%NR (NR)
Roos case 3 (Aust/NZ, 2000)53139.6%€35.8%€15.1%€9.4%€NR (8Gy/1 - 40Gy/18)
Complicated-neuropathic pain
Nakamura case 3 (Japan, 2012)520%5.80%78.80%15.40%NR (NR)
Fairchild case 4 (Intl, 2009)8446.6%229.0%242.8%221.60%30Gy/10 (3Gy/1 – 45Gy/18)
Roos case 4 (Aust/NZ, 2000)53113.2%€52.8%€24.5%€9.4%€NR (8Gy/1 - 40Gy/20)
Complicated-impending spinal cord compression and impending pathologic fracture
De Bari case 4 (Italy, 2011)113€30.60%25.80%28.20%15.4%3NR (NR)