Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 10, 2014; 5(4): 781-791
Published online Oct 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.781
Published online Oct 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.781
Ref. | Country | N | Site | Detection (PCR, p16,ISH)a | Prevalence of HPV-positive diseaseb | Follow-up timec (1median, 2mean, 3range) | Significantly improved prognosis for HPV-positive tumor status? (Yes/No) | Prognosis for HPV-positivevs HPV-negative diseased | Factors adjusted for |
Andl et al[31], 1998 | Germany | 31 | Tonsil | PCR, p16 | 48% | 28 mo2 | Yes | OS: improved (P = 0.0071) DFS: median 61.1 mo vs 25.8 mo (P = 0.028) | Overall stage |
Gillison et al[47], 2000 | United States | 259 | HNSCC | PCR, ISH | 25% overall; 57% OP | 31 mo2 | Yes | OS: 91 mo vs 76 mo, HR 0.6 (0.35-1.0, P = 0.07); DSS: HR 0.41 (0.20-0.88, P = 0.02) | Age, LN disease, alcohol |
Mellin et al[32], 2000 | Sweden | 60 | Tonsil | PCR | 43% | 59 mo1 | Yes | OS: 5-yr 53.5% vs 31.5%; RFS: OR 19.6 (P = 0.014); DSS: improved (P = 0.047) | RFS: Overall stage DSS: Overall stage, LN metastases, age, gender |
Lindel et al[33], 2001 | Switzerland | 99 | OP | PCR | 14% | Yes | LFFS: RR 0.31 (0.09-0.99, P = 0.048) | T, alcohol, intratumoral microvessel density | |
Weinberger et al[78], 2006 | United States | 123 | OP | p16 | 13% | 33 mo2 | Yes | OS: 5-yr 60% vs 21%, HR 0.422 (0.2-0.9, P = 0.021) DFS: 5-yr 62% vs 19%, HR 0.359 (0.2-0.7, P = 0.006) | tumor type (primary vs recurrent), overall stage, grade, treatment |
Weinberger et al[78], 2006 | United States | 79 | OP | PCR, p16 | 61% | 22 mo2 | Yes | OS: 5-yr 79% vs 18%-20%, HR 0.19 (0.1-0.7, P = 0.13) DFS: 5-yr 75% vs 13%-15%, HR 0.20 (0.1-0.6), P = 0.005) | primary vs recurrence, treatment, overall stage, grade |
Licitra et al[82], 2006 | Italy | 90 | OP | PCR, p16 | 19% | 5.8 yr1 | Yes | OS: 5-yr 79% vs 46% (P = 0.0018), improved when adjusted for stage | Overall stage |
Reimers et al[72], 2007 | Germany | 106 | OP | PCR, p16 | 30% | Yes | DFS: 85% vs 49% (P = 0.009), HR for HPV-negative tumors 7.5 (1.22-46.19), P = 0.030 | EGFR expression status, overall stage | |
Kumar et al[73], 2008 | United States | 66 | OP | PCR, p16 | Yes | OS: improved (P = 0.006) DSS: improved (P = 0.02) | Smoking, gender | ||
Fakhry et al[6], 2008 | United States | 96 | OP, larynx | PCR, ISH | 63% OP, 0% larynx | 39.1 mo1 | Yes | OS: 2-yr 95% vs 62% (P = 0.005), HR 0.36, (0.15-0.85) PFS: HR 0.27 (0.10-0.75) | age, overall stage, ECOG performance status |
Hafkamp et al[71], 2008 | Netherlands | 81 | Tonsil | ISH, p16 | 41% | 30 mo2 | Yes | DSS: 5-yr 55% vs 29%, unadjusted HR 2.3 (1.1-4.5) | |
Worden et al[37], 2008 | United States | 66 | OP | PCR | 64% | 64 mo1 | Yes | OS: improved (P = 0.008) DSS: improved (P = 0.004) | gender, smoking, T, N, age, site |
Smith et al[28], 2009 | Germany | 60 | OP | PCR, ISH, p16 | 47% | 27.5 mo1 | Yes | DFS: 5-yr 71% vs 46%(P = 0.02) | |
Lassen et al[36], 2009 | Denmark | 156 | Supragl- ottic larynx, pharynx | p16 | 22% | > 5 yr | Yes | OS: 5-yr 62% vs 26% (P = 0.0003), HR 0.44 (0.28-0.68) DSS: 5-yr 72% vs 34% (P = 0.0006), HR 0.36 (0.20-0.64) | T, N |
Ang et al[7], 2010 | United States | 323 | OP | ISH, p16 | 63.80% | 4.8 yr1 | Yes | OS: 3-yr 82.4% vs 57.1% (P < 0.001), HR 0.42 (0.27-0.66) PFS: 3-yr 73.7% vs 43.4% (P < 0.001), HR 0.49 (0.33-0.74) | age, race, T, N, tobacco exposure, treatment assignment |
Rischin et al[44], 2010 | United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Europe | 184 | OP | PCR, ISH, p16 | 57% | 29 mo2 | Yes | OS: 2-yr 91% vs 74% (P = 0.004), HR 0.43 (0.20-0.93), P = 0.031 | ECOG performance status, hemoglobin, T, N |
Chaturvedi et al[14], 2011 | United States | 271 | OP | PCR , ISH | 44% | 112 mo1 | Yes | OS: median 131 vs 20 mo (P < 0.001), HR 0.31 (0.21-0.46) | age, calendar period of diagnosis, overall stage, treatment |
Posner et al[35], 2011 | United States | 111 | OP | PCR | 50% | 82-83 mo1 | Yes | OS: improved, unadjusted HR 0.2 (0.10-0.38, P < 0.0001) PFS: 73% vs 29% (P < 0.0001) LRF: 13% vs 42% (P = 0.0006) | |
Liang[36], 2012 | United States | 488 | HNSCC | PCR, p16 | 62% | No | DSS (OP): HR 0.1 (0.02-0.4) |
- Citation: Friedman JM, Stavas MJ, Cmelak AJ. Clinical and scientific impact of human papillomavirus on head and neck cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5(4): 781-791
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v5/i4/781.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.781