Minireviews
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2014; 5(3): 546-553
Published online Aug 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.546
Table 3 Summary of guidelines for the management of in situ breast disease
Guideline sourceRecommendation-PLCISRecommendation-CLCISRecommendation-DCIS
ABS, 2009[16] (United Kingdom)PLCIS not mentionedShould consider diagnostic biopsy Clear margins not required Post-op surveillance is appropriate (No adjuvant treatment mentioned) (No lymph node surgery required)Resection with clear margins (> 1 mm) required (WLE or Mx) Intra-op radiography should be used for all DCIS as majority impalpable Lymph node surgery not usually required but may be considered in high risk cases
NCCN, 2013[20] (United States)“Consider excision with negative margins”Diagnostic biopsy Risk reducing treatment discussion with patient (options: risk reducing surgery, hormone therapy, no further treatment) Surveillance indicatedConsider MRI WLE or Mx Margin controversial but certainly > 1 mm SLNB usually not required but may be considered in high risk cases Consider RTx
ESMO, 2013[29] (pan-European)“May behave similarly to DCIS and should be treated accordingly”Risk factor for future development of invasive cancer and does not require active treatmentResection with clear margin (≥ 2 mm) required (WLE or Mx) SLNB usually not required but may be considered in high risk cases
NBOCC, 2003[27] (Australia)PLCIS not mentionedConsider surgical biopsy Surveillance ≥ 15 yr No role for clear margin excision establishedClear margin excision Usually adjuvant RTx Consider hormone therapy
NHSBSP “In situ lobular neoplasia: overview and recommendations” [pending publication][17] (United Kingdom)Should be classified B5a (as with DCIS) and excised with negative marginsMerits MDT discussion and usually diagnostic biopsy