Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2014; 5(3): 440-454
Published online Aug 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.440
Table 2 Selected clinical trials in the neo-adjuvant setting for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive breast cancer
StudyNeo-adjuvant chemotherapyNo. of patientsPathological completeresponse (%)CommentsRef.
Trastuzumab (H)
MD Anderson GroupT → FEC vs T → FEC + H19 vs 2326% (95%CI: 9%-51%) vs 65% (95%CI: 43%-84%)Probably the first study to emphasize better pCR with HBuzdar et al[24]
The NOAH TrialA + T → T → CMF vs A + T → T → CMF + H117 HER-2 (+) vs 118 HER-2 (+)22% (95%CI: not reported) vs 43% (95%CI: not reported)Not originally designed to test the effects of neoadjuvanceGianni et al[26]
The TECHNO TrialEC → TH21738.7% (95%CI: 32%-45%)Suggest pCR correlate with DFSUntch et al[27]
The Z1041 TrialFEC → TH vs T + H → FEC + H138 vs 14256.5% (95%CI: 48%-65%) vs 54.2% (95%CI: 46%-62%)Concurrent use of H with anthracyclines is not betterBuzdar et al[28]
The HannaH TrialDoc + H (SQ) → FEC + H vs Doc + H (IV) → FEC + H260 vs 26345.4% (95%CI: 39%-52%) vs 40.7% (95%CI: 35%-47%)H can be administered subcutaneouslyIsmael et al[30]
Lapatinib(L) +/- (H)
The GeparQuinto TrialECH → TH vs ECL → TL309 vs 31130.3% (95%CI: 25%-36%) vs 22.7% (95%CI: 18%-28%)Lapatinib is less effective that HUntch et al[31]
The NeoALLTO TrialTH vs TL vs THL149 vs 154 vs 15229.5% (22%–37%) vs 24.7% (22% -37%) vs 51.3% (43%-59%)Suggested that combination H + L could be quite effectiveBaselga et al[32]
The NSABP B-41 TrialAC → TH or TL or THL181 vs 174 vs 17452.5% (50%-59.5%) vs 53.2% (45%-60%) vs 62.0% (54%-69%)H + L no better. All patients received anthracyclinesRobidoux et al[33]
Pertuzumab (P)
The NeoSphere TrialDo + H vs Do + P + H vs Do + P vs P + H107 vs 107 vs 107 vs 9629.0% (21%-38.5%) vs 45.8% (36%-56%) vs 24.0% (16%-34%) vs 16.8% (10%-25%).Combination P + H result in better pCR.Gianni et al[34]
The Tryphaena Trial (Abstract Only)FEC + HP → Do + HP vs FEC → Do + HP vs TCHP223 patients in total62% vs 57% vs 66%TCH + P is an active combinationN/A