Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 10, 2014; 5(3): 359-373
Published online Aug 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.359
Published online Aug 10, 2014. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.359
FNA | CNB | |
Ability to distinguish invasive from in situ lesions | No | Yes |
Accurate for palpable lesions | Yes | Yes |
Accurate for non palpable lesions | No | Yes |
Useful for hypocellular and sclerotic lesions | No | Yes |
Diagnosis of papillary lesions | Low | Moderate |
Distinction of low grade lesions | Very difficult | Difficult |
Suitable for difficult or superficial sites | Yes | No |
Appropriate for patients with coagulation abnormalities | Yes | No |
Complication rate | Very low | Low |
Minimal invasiveness | Yes | No |
Special experience required | Yes | No |
Rapid (initial) diagnosis | Yes | No |
Patient discomfort | No | Yes |
Long tissue processing time | No | Yes |
Cost | Inexpensive | More expensive than FNA |
Requirement of anesthesia | No | Yes |
- Citation: Zervoudis S, Iatrakis G, Tomara E, Bothou A, Papadopoulos G, Tsakiris G. Main controversies in breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2014; 5(3): 359-373
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v5/i3/359.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.359