A prospective trial of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 3, Issue 4

This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

All Articles published online

Item

Count

PDF

424

HTML

5332

Figures (1-2)

291

Tables (1-4)

170

Sum=6217

Apr 10, 2012 (publication date) through Jul 18, 2024

Times Cited of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Oncology

ISSN

2218-4333

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Brief Article

World J Clin Oncol. Apr 10, 2012; 3(4): 57-62
Published online Apr 10, 2012. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v3.i4.57

Table 4 Mean dose to organs at risk across all intensity modulated radiation therapy and volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy plans

VMAT: Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy; IMRT: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Citation: Fung-Kee-Fung SD, Hackett R, Hales L, Warren G, Singh AK. A prospective trial of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy in advanced head and neck cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2012; 3(4): 57-62
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v3/i4/57.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v3.i4.57