Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 10, 2011; 2(9): 329-338
Published online Sep 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i9.329
Published online Sep 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i9.329
Breast cancer classification | Screening tests on biopsy sample | Current treatments | Expected outcomes |
Hormone receptor positive | Immunohistochemistry, confirmed by CGH | Mostly SERM or SERD which may slow tumor growth. Drugs include: tamoxifen, raloxifene and fulvestrant | High survival rate if responsive to chemotherapy |
TNBC | Immunohistochemistry | Surgery, radiation and chemotherapies which inhibit mitosis such as cisplatin | Initially sensitive to traditional chemotherapies and radiation therapy, but high recurrence rate thus poor survival rate[6,71,72] |
HER-2 Over-expression | Immunohistochemistry, confirmed by CGH or FISH | HER-2 agonists such as trastuzamab or lapatinib and sometimes doxorubicin | Although this is a fast growing cancer if responsive to therapy HER2 agonists can half the rate of recurrence[5,73] |
Luminal type A or B | Immunohistochemistry and micro-array or tissue array | As described above depending upon hormone receptor and growth factor receptor expression | 5-year recurrence rate is lower and survival rate higher than for basal-like breast cancers[71,72] |
BLBC | Immunohistochemistry and micro-array or tissue array | Similar to TNBC | 5-year recurrence rate higher and survival rate lower than for luminal breast cancer types[71,72] |
- Citation: Davis JD, Lin SY. DNA damage and breast cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2011; 2(9): 329-338
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v2/i9/329.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v2.i9.329