Copyright
©2010 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 10, 2011; 2(2): 94-107
Published online Feb 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i2.94
Published online Feb 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i2.94
Author | Yr | Background | P-value | Comments | ||
Chemotherapy | Without chemotherapy | With chemotherapy | ||||
Takada et al[186] | 2002 | Curative-resection | 28% 5-yr OS | 41% 5-yr OS | 0.48 | Two courses of mitomycin C plus infusional 5-FU, followed by oral 5-FU until tumor progression; 40% received a non-curative operation |
Non-curative resection | 16% 5-yr OS | 8% 5-yr OS | 0.300 | |||
Yubin et al[187] | 2008 | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | 37 mo MS | 43 mo MS | < 0.05 | Infusional gemcitabine based; no discrimination between curative and palliative resection; some of patients received radiation but the contribution of radiation was not analyzed |
Murakami et al[160] | 2009 | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | 23% 5-yr OS | 57% 5-yr OS | 0.026 | Infusional gemcitabine and oral S-1, every 2 wk |
Radiation | Without radiation | With radiation | ||||
Pitt et al[188] | 1995 | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | 20 mo MS | 20 mo MS | NS | |
Cameron et al[189] | 1990 | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | 21% 3-yr OS | 21% 3-yr OS | NS | |
Zlotecki et al[190] | 1998 | Bile duct cancer | 19% 5-yr OS | 35% 5-yr OS | NS | |
Heron et al[195] | 2003 | Distal cholangiocarcinoma | 63 mo MS | MS not reached (> 129 mo) | NS | |
Gonzalez et al[194] | 1999 | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | 0.023 | |||
8 mo MS | 19 mo MS | 0.001 | ||||
Schoenthaler et al[193] | 1994 | R1 resection | 11 mo MS | 22 mo MS, X-rays | 0.010 | |
61 mo MS, charged particles | 0.001 | |||||
Cheng et al[192] | 2007 | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | HR 4.3, 95% CI 3.6-4.9 | < 0.01 | Radiation was significantly helpful for R1/2 resection patients | |
Todoroki et al[191] | 2000 | Bile duct cancer | 14% 5-yr OS | 34% 5-yr OS | 0.010 | Radiation was significantly helpful for R1 resection patients |
Gerhards et al[197] | 2003 | Hilar cholangiocarcinoma | 8 mo MS | 24 mo MS | < 0.05 | |
Chemoradiation | Without chemoradiation | With chemoradiation | ||||
Nakeeb et al[198] | 2002 | Bile duct cancer | 11 mo MS (Chemotherapy alone) | 16 mo OS | 0.020 | Chemotherapy; 5-FU |
8 mo MS (Radiation alone) | ||||||
Kim et al[199] | 2002 | Bile duct cancer | 9% 5-yr OS (Radiation alone) | 41% 5-yr OS | 0.0005 | Chemotherapy; 5-FU, P = 0.14 in multivariate analysis |
Serafini et al[200] | 2001 | Bile duct cancer | 29 mo MS (Surgery alone) | 42 mo MS | 0.07 | Chemotherapy; 5-FU; when stratified by location, only distal tumors significantly benefited (41 mo MS vs 25 mo MS, P < 0.05) |
Hughes et al[201] | 2007 | Distal cholangiocarcinoma | 22 mo MS (Surgery alone) | 37 mo MS | 0.04 | Chemotherapy; 5-FU |
- Citation: Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Hashimoto D. Surgical strategy for bile duct cancer: Advances and current limitations. World J Clin Oncol 2011; 2(2): 94-107
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v2/i2/94.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v2.i2.94