Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Clin Oncol. Jan 10, 2011; 2(1): 50-63
Published online Jan 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i1.50
Published online Jan 10, 2011. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v2.i1.50
Author | Techniques | Patient population | Accuracy |
Bigio et al[41] | Elastic-scattering spectroscopy (a special diffuse reflectance spectroscopy) | 31 women, a total of 72 histology sites in breast tissue | Sensitivities of 69% and specificities of 85% for breast tissue |
Haka et al[42] | Raman spectroscopy | 9 patients undergoing partial mastectomy procedures | Accuracy of 100% for carcinoma; accuracy of 93.3% for distinguishing cancerous from normal and benign tissues |
Ramanujam et al[43] | Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in spectral imaging | 55 margins in 48 patients. | Sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 67% for detection of residual tumor, with an 89% sensitivity for ductal carcinoma in situ alone |
Keller et al[44] | Autofluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and spectral imaging | 145 normal spectra were obtained from 28 patients, and 34 tumor spectra were obtained from 12 patients | Differentiate normal tissue or tumor with 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity |
- Citation: Liu Q. Role of optical spectroscopy using endogenous contrasts in clinical cancer diagnosis. World J Clin Oncol 2011; 2(1): 50-63
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v2/i1/50.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v2.i1.50