Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2025; 16(4): 99801
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.99801
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.99801
Table 4 Incidence of low anterior resection syndrome, n (%)
| Variables | All patients (n = 43) | non-TDT (n = 10) | TDT (n = 33) | Statistic | P value |
| LARS | χ² = 3.86 | 0.049 | |||
| No | 18 (41.86) | 1 (10.00) | 17 (51.52) | ||
| Yes | 25 (58.14) | 9 (90.00) | 16 (48.48) | ||
| LARS | - | 0.059 | |||
| No | 18 (41.86) | 1 (10.00) | 17 (51.52) | ||
| Minor | 14 (32.56) | 5 (50.00) | 9 (27.27) | ||
| Major | 11 (25.58) | 4 (40.00) | 7 (21.21) |
- Citation: Cao YK, Yang SL, Wei ZQ. Is the use of a transanal drainage tube effective in treating anastomotic leakage for mid-low rectal cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(4): 99801
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i4/99801.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.99801