Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Apr 24, 2025; 16(4): 104785
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.104785
Published online Apr 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.104785
Table 3 Comparison table of comprehensive geriatric assessment and traditional assessment
Comparison dimensions | CGA | Traditional assessment |
Assessment scope | Multidimensional assessment, including physical, psychological, social, and functional status | Primarily focuses on tumor size, staging, and patient age |
Precision | Accurately assess patients’ functional status and identify high-risk patients | Pays less attention to individual patient differences |
Personalized treatment | Develop personalized treatment plans based on assessment results | Typically employs standardized treatment protocols |
Prognosis prediction | Predict patients’ treatment tolerance and long-term prognosis | Mainly relies on tumour markers, offering a limited prognosis prediction |
- Citation: Li CJ, Gong SM, Shi YJ, Guo YN, Song NN, Jiang LM, Wang YY, Zhang CJ, Wang YB, Li ZP, Wang P, Ruan YH, Shi Z, Li HY, Zhang QJ, Fu WP. Application of comprehensive geriatric assessment in oncology nursing: A literature review on optimizing treatment decisions and patient outcomes. World J Clin Oncol 2025; 16(4): 104785
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v16/i4/104785.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v16.i4.104785