Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Oncol. Mar 24, 2025; 16(3): 102076
Published online Mar 24, 2025. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v16.i3.102076
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox regression analysis for overall survival in patients receiving anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy
Covariate
Univariate
Multivariate
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
Age
≥ 65 vs < 65 years0.830.56-1.160.242NANANA
Female vs male0.90.65-1.250.525NANANA
ECOG PS
1 vs 01.060.70-1.620.78NANANA
2 vs 01.190.41-3.420.748
Underlying disease
Yes vs no0.910.66-1.240.54NANANA
Histologic subtype
Mucinous vs adenocarcinoma0.670.17-2.720.5750.350.08-1.430.142
Signet ring cell vs adenocarcinoma10.742.58-44.740.0019.792.31-41.570.002
Tumor grade
Moderately vs well differentiated1.120.76-1.650.5570.980.64-1.500.92
Poorly vs well differentiated2.381.24-4.580.0092.181.07-4.430.032
Metastatic type
Metachronous vs synchronous 0.920.59-1.420.696NANANA
Number of metastases
≥ 2 vs 1 site1.441.05-1.980.0241.440.87-2.390.161
Liver-limited metastasis
Yes vs no0.60.43-0.840.0021.710.92-3.170.088
Peritoneal metastasis
Yes vs no1.851.30-2.63< 0.0011.310.84-2.030.233
Anti-EGFR approach
Frontline vs subsequent-line1.030.73-1.460.8781.120.79-1.820.393
First-line bevacizumab
Yes vs no0.920.64-1.320.66NANANA
Metastectomy at liver
Yes vs no0.320.22-0.47< 0.0010.250.15-0.42< 0.001