Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2024; 15(9): 1177-1187
Published online Sep 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1177
Published online Sep 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1177
Table 3 Therapeutic regimen and best response in patients after propensity score matching, n (%)
Characteristics | Total (n = 93) | Patients with OBBT (n = 32) | Patients without OBBT (n = 61) | P value |
Therapeutic regimen | ||||
Chemotriplet regimen | 36 (38.7) | 6 (18.8) | 30 (49.2) | 0.006 |
1Chemodoublet-based regimen | 54 (58.1) | 24 (75.0) | 30 (49.2) | |
2Monotherapy | 3 (3.2) | 2 (6.3) | 1 (1.6) | |
Radiographic best response | ||||
CR or PR | 21 (22.6) | 11 (34.4) | 10 (16.4) | 0.157 |
SD/no CR or no PR | 62 (66.7) | 18 (56.2) | 44 (72.1) | |
PD | 7 (7.5) | 3 (9.4) | 4 (6.6) | |
NA | 3 (3.2) | 0 | 3 (4.9) | |
Radical surgery after systematic treatment | ||||
Yes | 14 (15.1) | 5 (15.6) | 9 (14.8) | 0.911 |
No | 79 (84.9) | 27 (84.4) | 52 (85.2) |
- Citation: Yao YH, Zhang H, Xiao Y, Liu ZT, Shi YY, Yu JY, Li Q, Cao BS. Systematic treatment in gastric cancer patients with overt bleeding: A propensity score matching analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15(9): 1177-1187
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v15/i9/1177.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v15.i9.1177