Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Oncol. Jul 24, 2024; 15(7): 920-935
Published online Jul 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.920
Published online Jul 24, 2024. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.920
Analysis | No. of studies | Risk ratio (95%CI) | I2 statistic (%) | P value for heterogeneity | Analytical model | P value for subgroup differences |
Study design | ||||||
RCT | 5 | 1.42 (1.23-1.64) | 41 | 0.15 | FEM | |
Prospective cohort | 2 | 2.24 (1.77-2.83) | 0 | 0.64 | FEM | |
Retrospective cohort | 18 | 2.27 (1.84-2.80) | 58 | 0.01 | REM | |
Not reported | 7 | 2.05 (1.77-2.36) | 45 | 0.09 | FEM | 0.02 |
Cut-off | ||||||
60% | 2 | 2.01 (1.57-2.58) | 0 | 0.90 | FEM | |
50% | 8 | 2.31 (1.95-2.74) | 0 | 0.71 | FEM | |
40% | 3 | 3.06 (1.60-5.84) | 78 | 0.01 | REM | |
30% | 3 | 2.33 (1.61-3.37) | 46 | 0.16 | FEM | |
20% | 4 | 1.68 (1.29-2.20) | 67 | 0.03 | REM | |
10% | 10 | 1.63 (1.24-2.15) | 49 | 0.04 | REM | |
Locations | ||||||
Asia | 12 | 1.90 (1.62-2.24) | 46 | 0.04 | FEM | |
Europe | 11 | 2.07 (1.58-2.71) | 77 | 0.01 | REM | |
Americas | 9 | 2.01 (1.76-2.30) | 34 | 0.14 | FEM | 0.35 |
Sample size | ||||||
n ≤ 80 | 16 | 2.62 (2.14-3.20) | 35 | 0.08 | FEM | |
n > 80 | 16 | 1.82 (1.56-2.12) | 69 | 0.01 | REM | 0.04 |
NAT regimens | ||||||
AC-T | 14 | 2.13 (1.72-2.63) | 56 | 0.01 | REM | |
TAC | 4 | 1.99 (1.43-2.75) | 0 | 0.44 | FEM | |
AC-T + targeted therapy | 3 | 1.73 (1.12-2.67) | 82 | 0.01 | REM | |
AC-TCb | 4 | 1.57 (1.31-1.90) | 43 | 0.15 | FEM | |
AC-T + Fu | 2 | 2.75 (1.28-5.92) | 0 | 0.61 | FEM | 0.02 |
- Citation: Sun HK, Jiang WL, Zhang SL, Xu PC, Wei LM, Liu JB. Predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes for neoadjuvant therapy response in triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15(7): 920-935
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v15/i7/920.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v15.i7.920