Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2022; 13(6): 429-447
Published online Jun 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i6.429
Table 3 Combined first-line immunotherapy options for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer
Study
n
Design
Treatment
RR
PFS
OS
NCT014507611132Phase III; Randomized, double-blind; Drug: IpilimumabArm A: PE × 4C + ipilimumab × 4C; Control: PE × 4C + placebo × 4CPR 62% vs 62%; SD 26% vs 27%; PD 6% vs 9%4.6 vs 4.4 mo; HR = 0.85, P = 0.016111.0 vs 10.9 mo; HR = 0.94, P = 0.3775
Impower 133403Phase III. Randomized, double-blind; Drug: AtezolizumabArm A: PE + atezolizumab × 4C/atezolizumab; Control: PE + placebo × 4C/placebo60% vs 64%5.2 vs 4.3 mo; HR = 0.77, P = 0.0212.3 vs 10.3 mo; HR = 0.70, P = 0.007
CASPIAN805Phase III. Randomized, open-label; Drug: DurvalumabArm B (n = 268): Durvalumab + PE × 4C/durvalumab; Control: PE × 4C68% vs 58%5.1 vs 5.4 mo; HR = 0.78, P not tested13.0 vs 10.3 mo; HR = 0.73, P = 0.0047
CASPIAN805Phase III. Randomized, open-label; Drug: Durvalumab + tremelimumabArm A (n = 268): Durvalumab + tremelimumab + PE × 4C/durvalumab + tremelimumab. Control: PE × 4C58% both arms4.9 vs 5.4 mo; HR = 0.8410.4 vs 10.5 mo; HR = 0.82, P = 0.045
KEYNOTE 604453Phase III; Randomized, double-blind; Drug: PembrolizumabArm A: Pembrolizumab + PE; Control: PE + placebo71% vs 62%4.5 vs 4.3 mo; HR = 0.75, P = 0.002310.8 vs 9.7 mo; HR = 0.80, P = 0.0164
ECOG-ACRIN160Phase I. Randomized, open-label; Drug: NivolumabArm A: PE + nivolumab × 4C/nivolumab; Control: PE × 4C52.29% vs 47.71%5.5 vs 4.6 mo; HR = 0.65, P = 0.01211.3 vs 8.5 mo; HR = 0.67, P = 0.038