Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2022; 13(10): 789-801
Published online Oct 24, 2022. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i10.789
Table 3 Comparison of characteristics between laparoscopic 3-port colorectal natural orifice specimen extraction surgery with a propensity score-matched cohort of conventional surgery
Characteristic
NOSE, n = 14 Frequency (%)
Non-NOSE, n = 56 Frequency (%)
P value
Age, mean ± SD (yr)67.4 ± 12.473.1 ± 10.20.182
Gender
Male5 (35.7)21 (37.5)0.765
Female9 (64.3)35 (62.5)
BMI, mean ± SD (kg/m2)24.8 ± 3.524.0 ± 4.10.526
ASA score
1 1 (7.1)1 (1.8)0.265
28 (57.1)43 (76.8)
35 (35.7)12 (21.4)
Tumor location
Caecum to transverse colon2 (14.3)18 (32.1)0.219
Splenic flexure to sigmoid 9 (64.3)22 (39.3)
Rectum3 (21.4)16 (28.6)
Surgery
Anterior resection7 (50.0)23 (41.1)0.576
Low anterior resection3 (21.4)13 (23.2)
Left hemicolectomy2 (14.3)3 (5.4)
Right hemicolectomy2 (14.3)17 (30.4)
Defunctioning stoma creation
Yes3 (21.4)9 (16.1)0.634
No11 (78.6)47 (83.9)
AJCC pT stage
T14 (28.6)7 (12.5)0.527
T22 (14.3)10 (17.9)
T37 (50)33 (58.9)
T41 (7.1)6 (10.7)
AJCC pN stage
N06 (42.9)33 (58.9)0.236
N17 (50.0)15 (26.8)
N21 (7.1)8 (14.3)
M stage
M013 (92.9)55 (98.2)0.282
M11 (7.1)1 (1.8)
Stage
I4 (28.6)13 (23.2)0.162
II1 (7.1)20 (35.7)
III8 (57.1)22 (39.3)
IV1 (7.1)1 (1.8)