Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2021; 12(9): 808-822
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.808
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.808
Imaging feature | Classification |
Mammogram | |
Appearance | Mass |
Asymmetry | |
High risk microcalcifications1 | |
Architectural distortion | |
Ultrasound | |
Margins | Spiculated |
Microlobulated | |
Circumscribed | |
Posterior acoustic features | Shadowing |
Enhancement | |
Mixed | |
None | |
Size | Maximum dimension on ultrasound (in mm) |
Echogenicity | Homogenous |
Heterogeneous | |
Complex cystic | |
Adler’s index | Low (Grade I) |
Medium (Grade II) | |
High (Grade III) |
- Citation: Ian TWM, Tan EY, Chotai N. Role of mammogram and ultrasound imaging in predicting breast cancer subtypes in screening and symptomatic patients. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(9): 808-822
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i9/808.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.808