Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2021; 12(9): 767-786
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.767
Table 4 Summary of selected publications reporting re-irradiation plus bevacizumab as salvage treatment in recurrent high-grade gliomas
Ref.Study typeNo. patientsHistologyRe-irradiation
Median intervalMedian tumor volumeMedian PFS2Median OS2Severe toxicityRadionecrosis
Total dose, median
Dose/fr, median
EQD2
Gutin et al[56], 2009P2520 GBM, 5 G3G30 Gy6 Gy60 Gy14.5 mo34 mL7.3 mo12.5 moG3: 1 hemorrhage; G4: 3 (1 bowel perforation, 1 wound dehiscence and 1 GI bleed)0%
Cuneo et al[54], 2012R63 (41 BEV)49 GBM, 8 G3G, 6 prior G2G15 Gy15 Gy63.8 Gy21 mo4.8 mLGBM: 5.2 mo (BEV) vs 2.1 mo (without BEV). 6 mo whole seriesGBM: 11.2 mo (BEV) vs 3.9 mo (without BEV). 10 mo whole series11%10%
Niyazi et al[52], 2012R30 (20 BEV)22 GBM, 8 G3G36 Gy2 Gy36 GyNRNR8 moMean 12 moG3:1; G4: 1 wound dehiscence0%
Shapiro et al[112], 2013R2420 GBM, 1 G3G, 3 G2G30 Gy6 Gy60 Gy12.6 mo35.3 mL7.5 mo (6.8 mo GBM)12.2 mo (whole series and GBM)Toxicity BEV: G4: 12.5%0%
Cabrera et al[113], 2013P158 GBM, 7 G3G18 Gy. 25 Gy18 Gy. 5 Gy90 Gy. 43.8 Gy20 moNR (< 5 cm)3.9 mo14.4 moG3:10%
Flieger et al[57], 2014P71 (57 BEV)52 GBM, 19 G3G and G2G36 Gy2 Gy36 GyNRNR5.6 mo (BEV) vs 2.5 mo (without BEV)GBM: 9.3 mo (BEV) vs 6.1 mo (without BEV)Toxicity BEV: G4: 5.3%4.2% (BEV) by image or histologically