Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Sep 24, 2021; 12(9): 746-766
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.746
Published online Sep 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.746
Ref. | Number of patients participating | Successful mobilization rates on previously failed chemotherapy + G-SCF driven mobilization (> 2 × 106) | Mobilization techniques |
Kobold et al[128] 2011 (Retrospective analysis) | 6 | 66.67% (4) | Chemo + G-CSF failed |
Plerixafor + G-CSF | |||
Horwitz et al[162] 2012 (Retrospective analysis) | 21 | 76% (17) | Chemo + G-CSF failed |
Plerixafor + G-CSF | |||
Worel et al[163] 2012 (Retrospective analysis) | 11 | 91% (10) | Plerixafor + G-CSF |
Garcia-Escobar et al[164] 2014 (Case series) | 5 | 80% (4) | Chemo + G-CSF failed |
Plerixafor + G-CSF | |||
Kosmas et al[165] 2014 (Pilot study) | 14 (3) | 100% (3) | Chemo + G-CSF failed |
Chemo + Plerixafor + G-CSF | |||
O’Hara et al[166] 2014 (Retrospective analysis) | 9 (3) | 100% (3) | Plerixafor + G-CSF |
- Citation: Porfyriou E, Letsa S, Kosmas C. Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization strategies to support high-dose chemotherapy: A focus on relapsed/refractory germ cell tumors. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(9): 746-766
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i9/746.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.746