Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Aug 24, 2021; 12(8): 581-608
Published online Aug 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i8.581
Table 1 Infectious Diseases Society of America levels of evidence and grades of recommendation and European Society of Medical Oncology adaptation
IDSA United States Public Health Service Grading System for Ranking Recommendations in Clinical Guidelines
ESMO adaptation of IDSA Grading System
Category, gradeDefinitionCategory, gradeDefinition
Strength of recommendationGrades of recommendation
AGood evidence to support recommendation for useAStrong evidence for efficacy with a substantial clinical benefit, strongly recommended, strongly recommended
BModerate evidence to support recommendation for useBStrong or moderate evidence for efficacy but with a limited clinical benefit, generally recommended
CPoor evidence to support a recommendationCInsufficient evidence for efficacy or benefit does not outweigh the risk or the disadvantages (adverse events, costs, etc.), optional
DModerate evidence to support a recommendation against useDModerate evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, generally not recommended
EGood evidence to support a recommendation against useEStrong evidence against efficacy or for adverse outcome, never recommended
Quality of evidenceLevels of evidence
IEvidence from > 1 properly randomized, controlled trialIEvidence from at least one large randomized, controlled trial of good methodological quality (low potential for bias) or meta-analyses of well-conducted randomized trials without heterogeneity
IIEvidence from > 1 well-designed clinical trial, without randomization; from cohort or case-controlled analytic studies (preferably from > 1 center); from multiple time series; or from dramatic results from uncontrolled experimentsIISmall randomized trials or large randomized trials with a suspicion of bias (lower methodological quality) or meta-analyses of such trials or of trials with demonstrated heterogeneity
IIIEvidence from opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committeesIIIProspective cohort studies
IVRetrospective cohort studies or case-control studies
VStudies without control group, case reports, experts opinions