Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Nov 24, 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
RTCh | Ch | P value | |
(n = 40) | (n = 27) | ||
No surgery | 5 (12.5) | 6 (22.2) | |
Pathological complete response | 6 (17.1) | 1 (4.8) | 0.23 |
Tumor response1 | 0.001 | ||
0%-10% | 19 (54.4) | 2 (9.5) | |
11%-30% | 9 (25.7) | 2 (9.5) | |
31%-50% | 4 (11.4) | 3 (14.3) | |
51%-70% | 2 (5.7) | 6 (28.6) | |
> 70% | 1 (2.8) | 8 (38.1) | |
Nodal response1 | 0.001 | ||
0%-10% | 30 (85.7) | 7 (33.3) | |
11%-30% | 1 (2.8) | 0 | |
31%-50% | 2 (5.7) | 3 (14.3) | |
51%-70% | 0 | 2 (9.5) | |
> 70% | 2 (5.7) | 9 (42.9) | |
Downstaging | 28 (80) | 7 (33.3) | 0.002 |
- Citation: Muñoz-Guglielmetti D, Sanchez-Lorente D, Reyes R, Martinez D, Lucena C, Boada M, Paredes P, Parera-Roig M, Vollmer I, Mases J, Martin-Deleon R, Castillo S, Benegas M, Muñoz S, Mayoral M, Cases C, Mollà M, Casas F. Pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC-contribution of IASLC recommendations. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i11/1047.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047