Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Nov 24, 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
Published online Nov 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047
Table 5 Pathological response, n (%)
RTCh
Ch
P value
(n = 40)
(n = 27)
No surgery5 (12.5)6 (22.2)
Pathological complete response6 (17.1)1 (4.8)0.23
Tumor response10.001
0%-10%19 (54.4)2 (9.5)
11%-30%9 (25.7)2 (9.5)
31%-50%4 (11.4)3 (14.3)
51%-70%2 (5.7)6 (28.6)
> 70%1 (2.8)8 (38.1)
Nodal response10.001
0%-10%30 (85.7)7 (33.3)
11%-30%1 (2.8)0
31%-50%2 (5.7)3 (14.3)
51%-70%02 (9.5)
> 70%2 (5.7)9 (42.9)
Downstaging28 (80)7 (33.3)0.002

  • Citation: Muñoz-Guglielmetti D, Sanchez-Lorente D, Reyes R, Martinez D, Lucena C, Boada M, Paredes P, Parera-Roig M, Vollmer I, Mases J, Martin-Deleon R, Castillo S, Benegas M, Muñoz S, Mayoral M, Cases C, Mollà M, Casas F. Pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in stage III NSCLC-contribution of IASLC recommendations. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(11): 1047-1063
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i11/1047.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i11.1047