Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. Oct 24, 2021; 12(10): 912-925
Published online Oct 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i10.912
Table 1 Clinical trials of adjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated tyrosine kinase inhibitors in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer
Clinical trialType of trialSample sizePrimary outcomeStageTreatmentPrevious adjuvant chemotherapyTKI Duration DFS OS
BR19, Goss et al[37]Phase III503 (15 with EGFR mutation)OSIB-IIIAGefitinib vs placeboYes (17% in gefitinib arm and 17% in placebo arm)2 yrHR 1.84; P = 0.3951HR: 3.16; P = 0.151
RADIANT, Kelly et al[38] Phase III973 (161 with EGFR mutation)DFS (ITT population)IB-IIIAErlotinib vs placeboYes (45.1% in erlotinib arm and 55.9% in placebo arm)12 yr46.4 vs 28.5 mo; HR: 0.61; P = 0.0391Median OS NR in both arms; HR: 1.09; P < 0.0011
SELECT, Pennell et al[39] Phase II1002-yr DFS IA-IIIAErlotinib Yes (not reported)2 yrMean DFS NR; 2-yr DFS 88%; 5-yr DFS 56%Median OS NR, 5-yr OS 86%
ADJUVANT/CTONG1104, Zhong et al[40,41]Phase III222DFSII-IIIAGefitinib vs cisplatin-vinorelbineNo2 yr28.7 vs 18 mo; HR: 0.60; P = 0.00543-yr DFS 39.6% vs 32.5%; P = 0.3165-yr DFS 22.6% vs 23.2%; P = 0.92875.5 vs 62.8 mo; HR: 0.92; P = 0.674
IMPACT, Tada et al[42]Phase III234DFSII-IIIGefitinib vs cisplatin-vinorelbineNo2 yr36 vs 25.2 mo; HR: 0.92; P = 0.63Median OS NR in both arms; HR: 1.03; P = 0.89
EVAN, Yue et al[43]Phase II1022-yr DFSIIIAErlotinib vs cisplatin-vinorelbineNo2 yr42.4 vs 21 mo; HR: 0.268; P < 0.00012-yr DFS 81.4% vs 44.6%; P = 0.00543-yr DFS 54.2% vs 19.8%; P = 0.0460Median OS NR in both arms; HR: 0.165; P = 0.0013
Neal et al[44]Phase II462-yr DFSIA-IIIAAfatinib 3 mo vs 2 yrYes (52% in 3-mo arm and 45% in 2-yr arm)3 mo vs 2 yr42.8 vs 58.6 mo2-yr DFS 81% vs 70%; P = 0.55 Median OS NR in both arms
ADAURA, Wu et al[45] Phase III682DFS in stages II-IIIAIB-IIIAOsimertinib vs placeboYes (60% in both arms)3 yrStages II-IIIA: NR vs 19.6 mo; HR: 0.17; P < 0.0012-yr DFS 90% vs 44%ITT: NR vs 27.5 mo; HR: 0.20; P < 0.0012-yr DFS 89% vs 52%Median OS NR in both arms (immature OS data)