Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 24, 2020; 11(2): 53-73
Published online Feb 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.53
Published online Feb 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.53
EORTC PET, 1999 | PERCIST, 2009 | iPERCIST, 2019 | |
CMR | Complete Resolution of FDG uptake1 | Complete Resolution of FDG uptake | Complete Resolution of FDG uptake |
PMR | 15-25% decrease of SUV after one cycle or > 25% decrease after more than one treatment cycle | ≥ 30% decrease in the target tumor SULpeak | ≥ 30% decrease in the target tumor SULpeak |
SMD | Increase of SUV by < 25% or decrease of SUV by < 15% | Neither CR, PR nor PD | Neither CR, PR nor PD |
PMD | Increase of SUV by > 25% or Increase of the longest diameter by 20% or new FDG avid lesion(s) | ≥ 30% increase in SULpeak or advent of new FDG avid lesions | ≥ 30% increase in SULpeak or advent of new FDG avid lesions (UPMD); Need to be confirmed by a second PET at 4-8 wk later (CPMD) |
- Citation: Aykan NF, Özatlı T. Objective response rate assessment in oncology: Current situation and future expectations. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11(2): 53-73
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v11/i2/53.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.53