Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Oncol. Feb 24, 2020; 11(2): 53-73
Published online Feb 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.53
Published online Feb 24, 2020. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.53
irRC (2D), 2009 | irRECIST (1D), 2013 | iRECIST (1D), 2017 | imRECIST (1D), 2018 | |
Minimum number of target lesions | 10 lesions in total; 5 lesions per organ | 5 lesions in total; 2 lesions per organ | 5 lesions in total; 2 lesions per organ | 5 lesions in total; 2 lesions per organ |
New lesions | Included in the sum of the measurements | Included in the sum of the measurements | iUPD; becomes iCPD if PD eventually confirmed | Included in the sum of the measurements |
CR | Disappearance of all lesions | Disappearance of all lesions | Disappearance of all lesions | Disappearance of all lesions |
PR | ≥ 50% decrease from baseline | ≥ 30% decrease from baseline | ≥ 30% decrease from baseline | ≥ 30% decrease from baseline |
SD | Neither CR nor PD | Neither CR nor PD | Neither CR nor PD | Neither CR nor PD |
PD | ≥ 25% increase in the nadir | ≥ 20% increase in the nadir (minimum 5 mm) | ≥ 20% increase in the nadir (minimum 5 mm) | ≥ 20% increase in the nadir (minimum 5 mm) |
Confirmation of PD | Yes | Yes1 | Yes2 | Yes3 |
- Citation: Aykan NF, Özatlı T. Objective response rate assessment in oncology: Current situation and future expectations. World J Clin Oncol 2020; 11(2): 53-73
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v11/i2/53.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v11.i2.53