Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Clin Oncol. Jan 10, 2019; 10(1): 1-13
Published online Jan 10, 2019. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i1.1
Published online Jan 10, 2019. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i1.1
Author | Type of study | n | Intervention | Xerostomia symptoms | Effect Size |
Bardet et al[46], 2011 | Phase III randomized trial | 291 | Amifostine IV vs SC | RTOG grading: G2+ xero significantly higher in SC at 1 yr, but not at 2-3 yr | 37% IV vs 62% SC |
Haddad et al[45], 2009 | Phase II randomized trial | 58 | SC amifostine 500 mg daily (for median 28 doses) no amifostine | CTCAE: no significant difference in Gr2+ xero (minimum follow up 26 mo) | 41% both arms |
Law et al[44], 2007 | Phase II prospective nonrandomized trial | 20 | SC 500 mg amifostine 30-60 min before RT | G2 xero 42% at 12 mo, 29% at 18 mo; no G3+ xero. G3+ mucositis in 30% of pts. | |
Anné et al[43], 2007 | Phase II single arm multicenter trial | 54 | SC amifostine | RTOG scoring: G2+ xero = 56%; late G2+ in 45% ; G3+ acute 33% | |
Jellema et al[23], 2006 | Phase II randomized trial | 91 | No amifostine vs 200 mg/m2 IV daily (3 wk) vs 5 wk | RTOG scoring: significant difference in late G2+ xero at 6 mo between arms; no difference in xero at 12 mo or 24 mo; no dif in acute xero | Late G2+ xero 74% vs 67% vs 52% |
EORTC QLQ-H and N35: significantly higher mean xerostomia score in no amifostine group | |||||
Buentzel et al[41], 2006 | Phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial | 132 | IV amifostine 300 mg/m2 days 1-5 and 21-25, 200 mg/m2 on other days vs placebo | RTOG criteria: no significant difference in G2+ acute or late xero | 39% amifostine vs 34% placebo (acute); 39% amifostine vs 24% placebo (late) |
Wasserman et al[42], 2005 | Phase III randomized trial | 303 | IV amifostine 200 mg/m2 15-30 prior to each RT fraction vs no amifostine | RTOG scoring: significantly lower G2+ xero in amifostine group on longitudinal analysis | 20% vs 36% at 24 mo |
Thorstad et al[47], 2004 | Pilot clinical trial | 27 | Amifostine concurrent with RT (500 mg SC daily) | not reported | NA |
Antonadou et al[40], 2002 | Randomized controlled trial | 50 | Amifostine 300 mg/m2 15-30 min prior to RT (daily) vs no amifostine | RTOG/EORTC scoring: significantly lower xero in amifostine group at 18 mo (G1+) | 30.4% vs 4.5% |
Brizel et al[39], 2000 | Phase III multiinstitutional randomized trial | 303 | Amifostine 200 mg/m2 15-30 min prior to each RT tx vs no amifostine | RTOG scoring: significantly higher G2+ xero (acute and late) in control vs amifostine; higher dose required to cause G2 xero in amifostine pts (60 Gy vs 42 Gy); | 78% vs 51% (acute); 57% 43% (1 yr) |
Büntzel et al[38], 1998 | Phase II randomized trial | 39 | Amifostine IV 500mg prior to carboplatin (days 1-5 and 21-25) vs no amifostine | Acute G2 xero, G3 mucositis, and G3 thrombocytopenia all significantly decreased with amifostine; at 12 mo, trend toward xero improvement with amifostine | Xero: G2 100% vs 12% (acute); 55% vs 17% (late; P = 0.05) |
- Citation: Ma SJ, Rivers CI, Serra LM, Singh AK. Long-term outcomes of interventions for radiation-induced xerostomia: A review. World J Clin Oncol 2019; 10(1): 1-13
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v10/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v10.i1.1