Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. May 6, 2014; 5(2): 97-104
Published online May 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97
Published online May 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97
Ref. | Successful stent placement | Shunt stenosis | Finalpatency | EVS per patient mean ± SD | Patients crossing over to TIPS | Clinical failure TIPS/EVS | Variceal rebleeding TIPS/EVS | HE TIPS/EVS | Refractory HE TIPS/EVS | Death TIPS (%)/EVS (%) |
Mahadeva et al[13] | 18/20 (90) | 2/20 (10) | 16/20 (80) | 3 ± 1.5 | 2 (9) | 2 (10)/4 (17) | 4 (20)/8 (35) | 21 (10)/0 (0) | NR | 1 (5)/2 (9) |
Lo et al[19] | 35/35 (100) | 8/35 (23) | 27/35 (77) | 3.3 ± 1.4 | 1 (3) | 1 (3)/3 (8) | 7 (20)/19 (51) | 9 (26)/1 (3) | NR | 16 (46)/12 (32) |
Procaccini et al[7] | NR | 6/42 (14) | 36/42 (86) | 2 ± median | 7 (11) | NR | UA | 11 (25)/1 (2) | NR | 14 (32)/17 (28) |
-
Citation: Bai M, Qi XS, Yang ZP, Wu KC, Fan DM, Han GH. EVS
vs TIPS shunt for gastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2014; 5(2): 97-104 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v5/i2/97.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97