Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. May 6, 2014; 5(2): 97-104
Published online May 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97
Published online May 6, 2014. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97
Ref. | Type of stent | Type of EVS | Randomized | Prospective study | Consecutive patients | Comparable base-line data | Definition of variceal rebleeding | Definition of post-TIPS HE | Lost (TIPS/EVS) |
Mahadeva et al[13] | Bare | Cyanoacrylate | No | No | No | Yes | NR | NR | 0/0 |
Lo et al[19] | Bare | Cyanoacrylate | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Rebleeding from GV or EV was defined as the presence of hematemesis or melena with the bleeding source being endoscopically proven to originate from GV or EV, respectively | Patients with altered consciousness levels and elevated arterial ammonia levels requiring hospitalization were recorded as having the complication of hepatic encephalopathy | 1/6 |
Procaccini et al[7] | 29 with covered stent, 15 with bare stent | Cyanoacrylate | No | No | NR | Yes | Rebleeding was defined by a significant decrease in hemoglobin or hematocrit requiring packed red cell transfusion or evidence of hematemesis or melena with hemodynamic insufficiency | NR | NR/NR |
-
Citation: Bai M, Qi XS, Yang ZP, Wu KC, Fan DM, Han GH. EVS
vs TIPS shunt for gastric variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2014; 5(2): 97-104 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v5/i2/97.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v5.i2.97