Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Aug 6, 2011; 2(4): 27-35
Published online Aug 6, 2011. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27
Published online Aug 6, 2011. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27
Table 5 Assessment of stress ulcer prophylaxis practice per indication n (%)
SUP variable | Candidates | Non-candidates | P-value |
Acid-suppressant drugs | |||
PPIs | 208 (62.8) | 410 (60.9) | |
H2-RAs | 123 (37.2) | 263 (39.1) | 0.557 |
Dose | |||
Appropriate | 281 (84.9) | 610 (90.0) | |
Inappropriate | 50 (15.1) | 61 (9.1) | 0.004 |
Route | |||
Appropriate | 150 (45.3) | 301 (44.7) | |
Inappropriate | 181 (54.7) | 372 (55.3) | 0.859 |
Dose and route | |||
Appropriate | 124 (37.5) | 265 (39.4) | |
Inappropriate | 207 (62.5) | 408 (60.6) | 0.558 |
Duration (d) | |||
Median (IQR) | 5.0 (7.0) | 3.0 (4.0) | < 0.0011 |
Discharge on SUP | |||
Yes | 49 (28.8) | 70 (20.9) | |
No | 121 (71.2) | 265 (79.1) | 0.047 |
- Citation: Zeitoun A, Zeineddine M, Dimassi H. Stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: Are they being implemented in Lebanese health care centers? World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2011; 2(4): 27-35
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v2/i4/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27