Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Jul 18, 2019; 10(3): 57-66
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v10.i3.57
Published online Jul 18, 2019. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v10.i3.57
Table 4 Comparison of apnea events reported by Capnostream and Linshom devices
Subject | Capnostream | Linshom | Capnostream–Linshom (95%CI) |
1 | 0 | 0 | -- |
4 | 0 | 1.4 (1.4, 1.4) | -1.4 (-1.4, -1.4) |
5 | 0 | 0 | -- |
6 | 30.3 (29.9, 30.8) | 23.3 (23.0, 23.7) | 7.0 (6.7, 7.3) |
7 | 0 | 0.81 (0.81, 0.81) | -0.81 (-0.81, -0.81) |
9 | 4.8 (4.6, 5.0) | 5.1 (4.9, 5.3) | -0.30 (-0.40, -0.20)) |
10 | 0.83 (0.76, 0.91) | 1.8 (1.7, 1.9) | -0.93 (-1.03, -0.84) |
11 | 0 | 0 | -- |
- Citation: Wadhwa V, Gonzalez AJ, Selema K, Feldman R, Lopez R, Vargo JJ. Novel device for monitoring respiratory rate during endoscopy-A thermodynamic sensor. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2019; 10(3): 57-66
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v10/i3/57.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v10.i3.57