Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. May 15, 2014; 5(2): 100-106
Published online May 15, 2014. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i2.100
Published online May 15, 2014. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v5.i2.100
Ref. | Rate | Follow up period (yr) | |
Arima et al[23], 1999 | 7.90% | 6/76 | 71 |
Nasu et al[10], 2005 | 14% | 20/143 | 4.8 (median) |
Nakajima et al[9], 2006 | 8.40% | 53/633 | 4.4 (mean) |
Kim et al[48], 2007 | 2.70% | 13/479 | 3.3 (median) |
Kobayashi et al[28], 2010 | 12.80% | 30/234 | 5 (median) |
Lee et al[49], 2011 | 3.30% | 15/458 | 2.2 (median) |
Kato et al[19], 2013 | 5.20% | 65/1258 | 2.2 (mean) |
Total | 6.70% | 202/3281 |
- Citation: Nishida T, Tsujii M, Kato M, Hayashi Y, Akasaka T, Iijima H, Takehara T. Endoscopic surveillance strategy after endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2014; 5(2): 100-106
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5330/full/v5/i2/100.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v5.i2.100